The accessibility of your product, held to WCAG 2.2 by people who don’t build it, watched as it changes, and written down so you can show the work.
See what better access looks likeYou should always know where you are.
Before: no accessible name
<button>
<svg>…</svg>
</button>After: a name and a clear action
<button>
Save preferences
<svg aria-hidden="true">…</svg>
</button>Accessibility becomes real in the details: a button with a clear name, a document with a reading order, a form someone can finish.
An icon alone may leave a screen reader with nothing useful to announce.
A visible label gives the button a name. A native button brings keyboard support with it.
Read the name. Tab to the button. Press Enter. Verify what happens next.
Independent review finds the barriers. Monitoring keeps them from coming back. Documentation shows the work.
People who didn’t build your product test it against WCAG 2.2, with a keyboard, a screen reader, and real tasks, not only an automated scan.
Talk to usAn evaluation checks
Products change every week. Monitoring keeps checking as they do, so a fixed barrier doesn’t quietly come back.
Get the toolRe-checked as your product changes
Every finding is written down with where it is, the criterion it fails, and how it was fixed, so you can show your work.
See how we document this siteEach finding records
These are the targets we design this site to and check in automated browser tests. Transitions switch off when you ask for reduced motion. Automated checks are only one part of an accessibility review.
The standards and reporting frameworks behind the work.
Read the guidance. Understand the requirements. Turn the next question into a practical next step.
Read the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, the foundation for accessible web content.
Get a practical introduction to evaluating accessibility, from first checks to a full review.
Start with the basics. Keep the people using your work in view.
It means people with disabilities can use your websites, apps, and documents. That includes people who navigate with a keyboard, use a screen reader, magnify text, or need captions.
No. Automated checks are one part of the work. Human review is needed to evaluate the experience and determine whether a site meets accessibility standards. Read W3C’s guidance on evaluation.
Start with a task people need to complete: finding information, filling in a form, or reading a document. Check the whole path, including what happens when something goes wrong.
A link to your site or an example document is a useful start. Tell us who uses it, what you need help with, and any requirements or deadlines you are working toward.